One of the more consequential and avoidable gaps landlords fall into is discovering, usually at the worst possible moment — when an actual claim needs to be made — that their insurance policy doesn’t cover the situation they’re facing, because it was never actually designed for a let property in the first place.
Why standard home insurance doesn’t work for rental properties. A typical buildings and contents policy is underwritten on the assumption of owner-occupation. The moment a property is let to a tenant, that assumption no longer holds, and in many cases the policy becomes void — not just reduced in scope, but genuinely invalid — the instant the property is occupied by a tenant rather than the policyholder. This is a distinction some landlords, particularly those who’ve let a property they previously lived in without switching insurance, discover only when trying to make a claim.
What a proper landlord insurance policy should cover. Buildings cover that specifically accounts for a let property, including cover during any void or unoccupied periods, which standard policies often restrict or exclude after a relatively short period of vacancy. Loss of rent cover, which provides income replacement if an insured event — a fire or flood, for instance — makes the property temporarily unlettable. And increasingly relevant given the current legal landscape, legal expenses cover and rent protection cover, which can help offset the costs and lost income associated with a lengthy possession process should one become necessary.
Why legal expenses and rent protection cover matter more now. With court timelines for possession claims running considerably longer than under the old Section 21 system, the financial exposure from a problem tenancy has increased. Rent protection and legal expenses cover, which some landlords previously viewed as optional extras, are worth reassessing against the current realistic cost of a contested possession process — figures that have shifted meaningfully since these products were originally priced by many landlords’ existing policies.
Reviewing an existing policy, not just assuming it’s adequate. If a policy has been in place for several years without review, it’s worth checking whether it was properly updated whenever circumstances changed — a change in tenant type, a property that’s become an HMO, or any period of extended vacancy can all affect whether an existing policy still responds the way a landlord assumes it would. Insurance policies don’t automatically adjust to reflect a property’s evolving use; that adjustment needs to be actively managed.
A practical step worth taking. Rather than assuming existing cover is adequate, a periodic review — annually, or whenever anything about the property’s use or tenancy arrangement changes — against what’s actually being covered, and against the current realistic costs of the scenarios most likely to arise, is a modest investment of time relative to the potential gap it can identify.
General information, not financial advice. Property Lounge, Guildford.
Need a second opinion?
We’re Property Lounge, an ARLA Propertymark accredited lettings agency in Guildford. If anything above raised a question about your own property, we’re happy to talk it through — whether or not you’re a client, and whether or not you ever become one. No charge, no obligation, and we won’t chase you afterwards.
You can see how our fully managed lettings service works, what it costs, or book a free rental valuation.
Call 01483 369209 or email lettings@propertylounge.co.uk.
